Tool

System Support Health Check

A ten-minute check on whether one key system has genuine ongoing support, or is quietly running on inherited knowledge.

Tool: System Support Health Check

How to use this self-audit

A ten-minute check on whether one key system has genuine ongoing support, or is quietly running on inherited knowledge. About 10 minutes. Nothing you enter leaves your browser, and nothing is saved. Print or export before closing the page.

Your result

0 / 75

0 of 15 questions answered

Ownership0 / 25
Maintenance rhythm0 / 25
Documentation depth0 / 25

Complete all 15 questions for the final interpretation. Recommendations appear as you answer.

1. Ownership
01

Can you name, in a few seconds, exactly who owns this system?

Why this matters: Clear ownership prevents decisions and risks from falling between teams.

02

If that person left tomorrow, is there a clear next owner?

Why this matters: A tested backup reduces disruption when roles or availability change.

03

Does the owner have authority to approve routine changes?

Why this matters: Responsibility without decision authority creates delay rather than accountability.

04

Are business, technical and vendor responsibilities clearly separated?

Why this matters: Unclear boundaries allow incidents and changes to fall between teams.

05

When something fails, does everyone know who to contact first?

Why this matters: A clear first contact reduces delay during an incident.

2. Maintenance rhythm
01

Has this system been reviewed in the last six months outside of fixing a fault?

Why this matters: Planned review finds drift before it becomes an outage or entrenched workaround.

02

Are known workarounds or exceptions revisited periodically to check they're still needed?

Why this matters: Unreviewed workarounds become hidden dependencies and permanent control gaps.

03

Are patching, backups and access checks scheduled rather than ad hoc?

Why this matters: Routine controls fail when they depend on someone remembering them.

04

Are repeat incidents investigated beyond restoring service?

Why this matters: Repeated symptom fixes consume time while leaving the underlying risk in place.

05

Is there a plan before the system becomes unsupported or unstable?

Why this matters: Early planning avoids rushed replacement under operational pressure.

3. Documentation depth
01

Does documentation exist explaining why the system is built the way it is, not just what it does?

Why this matters: Decision context prevents future changes from breaking important assumptions.

02

Could a new person understand the system without needing to ask the original builder?

Why this matters: Usable documentation reduces dependence on personal memory.

03

Is there a current record of system inputs, outputs and dependencies?

Why this matters: Undocumented dependencies turn small changes into wider failures.

04

Are access rights documented and explainable?

Why this matters: Unclear access creates security, continuity and audit risk.

05

Could someone other than the expert follow the recovery process?

Why this matters: A recovery plan is only useful if it works when the expert is unavailable.

Results

Ownership

Can you name, in a few seconds, exactly who owns this system?

Unanswered

Ownership

If that person left tomorrow, is there a clear next owner?

Unanswered

Ownership

Does the owner have authority to approve routine changes?

Unanswered

Ownership

Are business, technical and vendor responsibilities clearly separated?

Unanswered

Ownership

When something fails, does everyone know who to contact first?

Unanswered

Maintenance rhythm

Has this system been reviewed in the last six months outside of fixing a fault?

Unanswered

Maintenance rhythm

Are known workarounds or exceptions revisited periodically to check they're still needed?

Unanswered

Maintenance rhythm

Are patching, backups and access checks scheduled rather than ad hoc?

Unanswered

Maintenance rhythm

Are repeat incidents investigated beyond restoring service?

Unanswered

Maintenance rhythm

Is there a plan before the system becomes unsupported or unstable?

Unanswered

Documentation depth

Does documentation exist explaining why the system is built the way it is, not just what it does?

Unanswered

Documentation depth

Could a new person understand the system without needing to ask the original builder?

Unanswered

Documentation depth

Is there a current record of system inputs, outputs and dependencies?

Unanswered

Documentation depth

Are access rights documented and explainable?

Unanswered

Documentation depth

Could someone other than the expert follow the recovery process?

Unanswered

If several of your key systems score this way, that's usually a data and systems ownership conversation, not an IT ticket. Data Engineering, Fabric and AI Readiness.